Re: December 2023 Weather Discussion
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:26 am
Prayers to your mom as well Les for a quick recovery!
Ohio Valley Weather Observation & Discussion
https://absolutevorticity.com/
Prayers to your mom as well Les for a quick recovery!
I had thought the pattern change would occur a bit sooner but without a big, strong cutter, it won't happen. We need a cutter to pull down the cold air then proper blocking to give it staying power. I am with you, I favor a cutter during this time frame.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:06 amGood morning Trev. It looks fairly boring until then, unless something pops up in the short term of course. This is the first time all season that I can recall that the GFS actually is showing the system on multiple runs. Even the 6Z run has it, albeit a weaker version so it's more SE and a snowier outcome for us. Of course this will change over and over again assuming we don't lose the storm. A big bomb cyclone that is a cutter would not surprise me. It fits the pattern then it should unleash a real wintry pattern behind it for the second half of January and into February per our original seasonal outlooks.
Record-breaking warmth in December is something I hammered on pretty heavily in my December outlook. It has panned out well (unfortunately for snow prospects).Bgoney wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:39 am I hear you dce, I don’t enjoy posting all the record breaking warmth stats, but I can’t not post something just because I don’t like it. Speaking of which this needs to be posted again because if there is a top ten sad post of record breaking warmth this year(and there was a lot to choose from), it’s probably the low of 15 for the calendar year which crushed previous records .
IMG_1061.jpeg
It's been a tough start to winter. No doubt about it. Many businesses are suffering economically especially those in the north who depend on the winter to get them thru the rest of the year. North American snow cover is at its lowest point in 20 or 30 years! It's amazing and not in a good way. In our area, it is usually either feast or famine. We can catch up quick with a big storm. Or we usually nickel and dime our way. I sure hope something changes and soon. I mean the pattern is changing even if we don't see the desired results in our sensible weather. That's what a lot of people don't understand. Most people don't think the pattern has changed until it snows in their own backyards and I get it. But from a 500 MB stand point (the upper levels) is what helps to produce the weather we see at the surface where we live.dce wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:19 amI have to start wondering what the records are for the latest 1 inch snowfalls at the big three climate stations across our area. If we get something in the next two weeks we are probably safe from hitting records. After that I do not know. It's so very sad that we have another year we have to talk about these unwanted type records. Half of climatological winter is going to have gone by with no snow yet again.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:06 amGood morning Trev. It looks fairly boring until then, unless something pops up in the short term of course. This is the first time all season that I can recall that the GFS actually is showing the system on multiple runs. Even the 6Z run has it, albeit a weaker version so it's more SE and a snowier outcome for us. Of course this will change over and over again assuming we don't lose the storm. A big bomb cyclone that is a cutter would not surprise me. It fits the pattern then it should unleash a real wintry pattern behind it for the second half of January and into February per our original seasonal outlooks.
Yeah, we sure do need a big storm to change up the pattern for sure. I noticed on the 6Z GFS, we get no big cold plunge after that storm, since it was weaker, just to prove your point.Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:36 amI had thought the pattern change would occur a bit sooner but without a big, strong cutter, it won't happen. We need a cutter to pull down the cold air then proper blocking to give it staying power. I am with you, I favor a cutter during this time frame.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:06 amGood morning Trev. It looks fairly boring until then, unless something pops up in the short term of course. This is the first time all season that I can recall that the GFS actually is showing the system on multiple runs. Even the 6Z run has it, albeit a weaker version so it's more SE and a snowier outcome for us. Of course this will change over and over again assuming we don't lose the storm. A big bomb cyclone that is a cutter would not surprise me. It fits the pattern then it should unleash a real wintry pattern behind it for the second half of January and into February per our original seasonal outlooks.
A requisite for a vast majority of pattern changes is a bomb cyclone of sorts. And usually bomb cyclones are cutters in our region.
Very good point regarding the pattern change. A parade of troughs now versus the stagnant zonal pattern. In that respect yes the pattern has changed on schedule. I was more-so honing in on if/when the change to colder will occur.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:52 amIt's been a tough start to winter. No doubt about it. Many businesses are suffering economically especially those in the north who depend on the winter to get them thru the rest of the year. North American snow cover is at its lowest point in 20 or 30 years! It's amazing and not in a good way. In our area, it is usually either feast or famine. We can catch up quick with a big storm. Or we usually nickel and dime our way. I sure hope something changes and soon. I mean the pattern is changing even if we don't see the desired results in our sensible weather. That's what a lot of people don't understand. Most people don't think the pattern has changed until it snows in their own backyards and I get it. But from a 500 MB stand point (the upper levels) is what helps to produce the weather we see at the surface where we live.dce wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:19 amI have to start wondering what the records are for the latest 1 inch snowfalls at the big three climate stations across our area. If we get something in the next two weeks we are probably safe from hitting records. After that I do not know. It's so very sad that we have another year we have to talk about these unwanted type records. Half of climatological winter is going to have gone by with no snow yet again.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:06 amGood morning Trev. It looks fairly boring until then, unless something pops up in the short term of course. This is the first time all season that I can recall that the GFS actually is showing the system on multiple runs. Even the 6Z run has it, albeit a weaker version so it's more SE and a snowier outcome for us. Of course this will change over and over again assuming we don't lose the storm. A big bomb cyclone that is a cutter would not surprise me. It fits the pattern then it should unleash a real wintry pattern behind it for the second half of January and into February per our original seasonal outlooks.
So far, the current stats look like this:
CVG - 0.8" (-3.6")
DAY - 0.8" (-4.2")
CMH - 0.4" (-5.2")
It is pretty sad as we both know. To answer your question, I am not sure what our records are for that. The normal 1st 1" of snow at CVG is 12/14 so we are only 2 weeks behind. At DAY, it is 12/7, and at CMH it is 12/11.
Thanks and yes I know what you meant. I think that was the point Doug was making as well.Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:58 amVery good point regarding the pattern change. A parade of troughs now versus the stagnant zonal pattern. In that respect yes the pattern has changed on schedule. I was more-so honing in on if/when the change to colder will occur.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:52 amIt's been a tough start to winter. No doubt about it. Many businesses are suffering economically especially those in the north who depend on the winter to get them thru the rest of the year. North American snow cover is at its lowest point in 20 or 30 years! It's amazing and not in a good way. In our area, it is usually either feast or famine. We can catch up quick with a big storm. Or we usually nickel and dime our way. I sure hope something changes and soon. I mean the pattern is changing even if we don't see the desired results in our sensible weather. That's what a lot of people don't understand. Most people don't think the pattern has changed until it snows in their own backyards and I get it. But from a 500 MB stand point (the upper levels) is what helps to produce the weather we see at the surface where we live.dce wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:19 amI have to start wondering what the records are for the latest 1 inch snowfalls at the big three climate stations across our area. If we get something in the next two weeks we are probably safe from hitting records. After that I do not know. It's so very sad that we have another year we have to talk about these unwanted type records. Half of climatological winter is going to have gone by with no snow yet again.tron777 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:06 amGood morning Trev. It looks fairly boring until then, unless something pops up in the short term of course. This is the first time all season that I can recall that the GFS actually is showing the system on multiple runs. Even the 6Z run has it, albeit a weaker version so it's more SE and a snowier outcome for us. Of course this will change over and over again assuming we don't lose the storm. A big bomb cyclone that is a cutter would not surprise me. It fits the pattern then it should unleash a real wintry pattern behind it for the second half of January and into February per our original seasonal outlooks.
So far, the current stats look like this:
CVG - 0.8" (-3.6")
DAY - 0.8" (-4.2")
CMH - 0.4" (-5.2")
It is pretty sad as we both know. To answer your question, I am not sure what our records are for that. The normal 1st 1" of snow at CVG is 12/14 so we are only 2 weeks behind. At DAY, it is 12/7, and at CMH it is 12/11.
Trevor, I take it that once that cold front passes (according to how it looks on this map atm) that we'll have lows of 5-10 above and highs of 25-30? That would be cold that a lot of us haven't experienced since the Arctic outbreak a year ago! it'll be a shock to our system for sure!
Verbatim (00z GFS) it would likely be colder than that. Highs in the teens, lows similar to what you said, maybe near 0.winterstormjoe wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:06 amTrevor, I take it that once that cold front passes (according to how it looks on this map atm) that we'll have lows of 5-10 above and highs of 25-30? That would be cold that a lot of us haven't experienced since the Arctic outbreak a year ago! it'll be a shock to our system for sure!
Yep , the commies have commandeered the cold all winter. Winning the cold warwinterstormjoe wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:09 amBgoney, there isn't a lot of blues and greens showing up on this map with the exception of China! Wow, is all I can say!
Quite funny. We get a southeast ridge and it's too warm for snow. No southeast ridge and it's too warm for snow.
We did break out of the drought this past Jan-Mar but having above normal rainfall in the winter is usually not a way to end droughts. California has problems because the rainy season is in the winter and many reasons you see plenty of fires starting in later summer and the fall season.
I sure did miss a good ole fashioned clipper pattern. Those just seem to be non-existent anymore.Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:01 am Sustained cold in our region is hard to come by during an El Nino, especially a more significant one. But as you have mentioned many times, we don't need super sustained cold, just cold enough to get snow. In all reality that is how it usually goes around here anyways when we get a big one. Temps in the upper 20s/lower 30s. If we are in the ice box, then suppression city but we can do well with clippers in that regime.